James Holmes: Can we believe the official story?

Posted on August 12, 2012


Lewis Scally
brainguff Writer

Holmes’ record before the Aurora shooting is so squeaky clean and devoid of any information that it’s difficult to imagine this apparently shy and retiring neuroscience student committed such an horrendous crime –  his greatest run in with the law prior to the shooting was a parking ticket.
According to news reports, this sudden violent rampage was completely out of character for James Holmes, who was described by those who knew him as “shy”. However, relevations such as this is nothing new, in fact it’s quite common for violent criminals to have been previously thought of as a gentle, loving and inconspicuous person.

The New York Times reported:
Billy Kromka, a pre-med student at the University of Colorado, Boulder, worked with Mr. Holmes for three months last summer as a research assistant in a lab of at the Anschutz Medical Campus. Mr. Kromka said he was surprised to learn Mr. Holmes was the shooting suspect. “It was just shocking, because there was no way I thought he could have the capacity to do commit an atrocity like this,” he said.
Holmes’ behavior reveals stark inconsistencies that question the mainstream explanation of events. For example, he opened fire on innocent people but then calmly surrendered to police without resistance. This is not consistent with the idea of “killing everyone.”
Furthermore, he then admitted to police that his apartment was booby-trapped with explosives.

If you were really an evil-minded Joker trying to kill people, why would you warn them about the booby trap in advance? What was the point of booby trapping the apartment in the first place? It doesn’t add up.

Let’s take a look at a couple of theories that I believe to be most plausible.

Theory 1:
The supposed ‘James Holmes’ present at the courtroom hearing is not in fact the real James Holmes. Take a look at the image below. Can you be sure these two pictures are of the same man?

James Holmes: Before and After?







I will allow you to make your own mind up as to whether you think it could be the case that these are, in fact, two different men. If this is the case, it throws a huge spanner in the works of the official story.

Theory 2:
As we know James Holmes was a Neuroscience student at The University of Colorado, Denver. We are also aware he rejected The university of Illinois in favor of Colorado (why he would to so is beyond me seeing as Illinois is far more prestigious) only to drop out of the course in June of this year with no apparent explanation.

Is it possible James Holmes was involved in a mind control experiment? Whether that be at his own will or via manipulation. If so, who was responsible? The government? They certainly have a rather bloody slate, and have been accused of similar affairs before. If this was the case and the government were behind his actions, the question has to be asked – why?

I am aware of the obvious reasons behind why they would be interested in such research, you only need imagine a army of emotionless controllable beings. Scary. I cant help but feel that the event was conveniently close to the big push for a recall of all arms. It coincides very well with the scheduled meetings, and possible signing of the bill. So maybe he was used to create evidence as to why the bill should be passed – if so then it certainly did the trick. And, after all, an unarmed population is most certainly easier to control.

I would love to hear your opinions and find out about any interesting evidence you may hold.

Comments not only welcomed, but encouraged!


Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in: Random